Some elements of Vancouver’s media stirred the pot last week over, of all things, two public bike pumps. The pumps were recently installed at Hawks Ave. and Union St. (on the Adanac bike route) and at Science World, near the convergence of the Seaside, Adanac, Ontario, and Central Valley Greenway bike routes. The pumps fit both Schrader and Presta valve types, and have been builIt to resist the elements. It’s been reported that the two pumps cost a total of $6,000.
CBC first reported on these pumps in early March. You can listen to Margaret Gallagher’s High Velocity report here.
However, it wasn’t until last week when Scout Magazine and then the Vancouver Courier ran a story that things started heating up. Both The Province’s editorial board and CTV went trolling, and Yahoo! Canada News piled on for good measure. The Province ran an anonymous editorial that was nothing short of an anti-cycling diatribe and then CTV devoted 3 minutes at the top of their 5pm newscast to outrage over this expenditure (with article and comments here). They also ran a web poll:
Side note: The Province requires Facebook login to comment on their editorials, CTV allows anonymous comments. Comparing and contrasting the difference and level of civility in the comments is left as an exercise to the reader, but let me say that people are much less likely to run their mouths when they actually have to put their name to it.
Twitter was pretty much agog at the level of outrage these two media outlets were trying to drum up. View the story “Vancouver Public Bike Pumps” on Storify
First, Jordan Bateman of the Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation pointed out The Province’s 155-word tirade against the pumps.
$3K for a bike pump? Province: Cyclists should pay for their own pumps. tinyurl.com/b446cx2
— Jordan Bateman (@jordanbateman) March 15, 2013
Then CTV picked up on the story, highlighted the “European” pump angle, and ran the web-poll.
The City of Vancouver just spent $6,000 on two imported bike pumps. Do you think the city caters too much to cyclists? Your tweets at 5!
— Lynda Steele (@CTVLyndaSteele) March 15, 2013
Response on Twitter was swift:
@ctvlyndasteele I can’t point to a single thing the City has done in favour of helping drivers. Everything is about cyclists, day and night.
— Mike Winsemann (@MikeWinsemann) March 15, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele The city needs to add these things for cyclists. Gas stations everywhere for cars, so add the pumps. Good job!!
— ??????? (@MissLilDvl) March 15, 2013
.@ctvlyndasteele Great cycling cities (London, Amsterdam, Berlin) spend $30 per citizen annually on bicycle infrastructure. Vancouver: $4.
— Chris Bruntlett (@cbruntlett) March 15, 2013
@anthonyfloyd @ctvbc Loaded question, giving motorists a chance to vent. Weak and lazy. Q: How subservient to cars is our culture? #bikeyvr
— Peter Louwe (@peterlouwe) March 15, 2013
classic editorial in @theprovince: cyclists aren’t taxpayers, council are activists who “seized” the budget ow.ly/j0muM #vanpoli
— Kevin Quinlan (@KQ_VanCity) March 15, 2013
@kq_vancity I love the shading of the line “..from Europe”. Council clearly a bunch of beret-wearing effite dandies who ride Pennyfarthings.
— Matthew Lazin-Ryder (@Lazin_Ryder) March 15, 2013
.@ctvlyndasteele To what shall we compare a $6,000 bike pump, to check the bias? Traffic lights, perhaps? Blacktop the area of a driveway?
— Rev. James Deroux (@situpvancouver) March 15, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele the question is, does the city cater too much to motorists? $6k is a drop in the bucket vs road/parking outlays.
— Chris Malmo (@chrismalmo) March 15, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele Not investing enough in cycling. London investing $619 million in all ages cycling network over 3 years! Safe 4 children.
— BC Cycling Coalition (@bccycle) March 15, 2013
@mikewinsemann @ctvlyndasteele Millions for left turn bays on Knight St. Roads almost everywhere design for cars, not safe for bikes.
— Richard Campbell (@wrychrd) March 15, 2013
Holy bicycle pump debate!Great arguments on both sides of the public pump purchase.Thanks for tweets – using some comments at 5 @ctvbc
— Lynda Steele (@CTVLyndaSteele) March 15, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele The province spends billions on motorists. You’re asking the wrongquestion about who’s being catered to.
— Jack Hope (@jackshope) March 15, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele Seriously though.. the city of Vancouver probably spent more than $6k today on paint for roads.
— Eric Goodwin (@auxonic) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteelebike pumps on our dime. Of course it’s the mayors pet project. That money could be better spent on social programs.
— Mindy Shepard (@mindyshepard511) March 16, 2013
With all due respect, 3k is a pittance compared to what roads ‘cost’ vancourier.com/Cost+city+bike… #vanpoli #bikeYVR
— Michael Patience (@brodiesovereign) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele @ctvbc Bike pumps are European. So what? Trade exists!, & euro is dog-whistle code for frilly socialist indulgence. #framing
— Chris Malmo (@chrismalmo) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele Have you seen how much this city caters to motorists? Investment in cycling infrastructure is small in comparison.
— Stephen Irving (@StephenIrving) March 16, 2013
@mikewinsemann @ctvlyndasteele In 2013, the City will spend $30m on improvements to major roads $10m for local roads. How does that compare?
— HUB (@WeAreHub) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele Only 268 uses of pumps to equal the same cost for that many indiv. ones. #share #sustainability #NOTconsumerism @wearehub
— Angela O’ Jarvis (@angelluski) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele $6,000 is nothing.The city spent $670,000 just to acquire land on Knight St to build the left hand turn lane at 33rd Ave.
— Nolan Drumm (@nolandrumm) March 16, 2013
@ctvlyndasteele @jordanbateman a little perspective on bike pumps and transporation subsidies twitpic.com/cbople
— rob baxter (@b5baxter) March 16, 2013
@turbo05 @ctvlyndasteele @ctvbc We need to move past #bike vs #car mentality. Everyone should feel safe, no matter what vehicle they choose.
— HUB (@WeAreHub) March 16, 2013
Love the #bikeYVR pumps that went viral on twitter last week? Show your support with an email to mayorandcouncil@vancouver.ca #vanpoli
— Kevin Chan (@Kevincc) March 16, 2013
On Sunday, however, The Vancouver Sun wrote a much-less negative story about the pumps.
The outrage is, of course, ridiculous.
The $6,000 cost is nothing compared to … well, pretty much anything associated with road or park improvements. The total budget of improving the Strathcona Linear Park was reported to be $200,000. $3,000 for purchasing and installing a bike pump amounts to 1.5% of the budget. Where’s the outrage over the remaining 98.5% of the budget? What do you think the “public” response would be over the gardening budget or the paving budget of that project? I suspect that, in general, “the public” has no idea how expensive public works are.
Does CTV report the installation costs of water fountains in parks? What about drinking fountains for dogs?
Vancouver has drinking fountains for people AND DOGS downtown! twitter.com/cesarmillan/st…
— Cesar Millan (@cesarmillan) October 1, 2012
How much do you think that cost?
These facts are known: increasing cycling in a city positively affects public health and reduces traffic congestion. This in turn results in positive contributions to the local economy. The City of Vancouver has recognized this for years; both the former NPA council and the current Vision council have made statements indicating that it’s a priority for the city to increase cycling in Vancouver. Increasing cycling amenities, like putting in public bike pumps, repair stations, better bike parking facilities, better bicycle access on transit, etc., increases the amount of cycling in the city.
The outrage should be that it’s taken until 2013 for two public bike pumps to be installed in the city.
Public bike amenities, like public washrooms, and yes, even drinking water fountains for dogs, are part of what make a city liveable and sustainable. They contribute to the greater good of the city. It’s a shame that so many people cannot see beyond themselves.